<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Polansky v. Pfizer - Whistleblower Law Blog</title>
<link>http://whistleblower.labovick.com/articles/whistleblower-legal-news/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:15:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:00:37 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Unsealed qui tam complaint against Pfizer is pressing forward</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The qui tam complaint&nbsp;against Pfizer, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119811136568740957.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">USA rel. Polansky v. Pfizer</a> is pressing forward according to court documents filed by the Plaintiff's legal counsel,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hagens-berman.com/">Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro</a>. To view the complaint, <a href="http://www.hbsslaw.com/files/Amended_Complaint_secured1198189024452.pdf">click here.</a>&nbsp;(Warning, the document is pretty lengthy, 97 pages, but worth every moment spent&nbsp;reading.) This comes after the&nbsp;whistleblower complaint&nbsp;being initially filed with the federal government about 3 1/2 years ago and the&nbsp;federal government deciding&nbsp;recently not to intervene. </p>
<p>It can be difficult for a whistleblower to press forward with a qui tam claim, they often lose their jobs, face retaliation, lose family and friends and often are forced to give up something they truly love.&nbsp;). The Pharmafraud Blogger discusses&nbsp;challenges whistleblowers can face while trying to do what is right, in the recent post&nbsp; <a href="http://pharmafraud.blogspot.com/2007/12/big-pharma-retaliation-just-more-of.html">Big Pharma Retaliation, Just More of the Same</a>, &quot;If you think Dr. Polansky, or I, or any other &quot;whistleblower&quot; was motivated by money to file a qui tam, then you are sorely mistaken. Every one of us simply tried to do what was right&quot;.&nbsp; However, I must add that whistleblowers, if&nbsp;successful,&nbsp;can receive up to 30 percent of the proceeds of what the government recovers. As we mentioned in a prior <a href="http://whistleblower.labovick.com/2007/11/articles/whistleblower-legal-news/whistleblower-legislation-pays-2007-government-recovered-2-billion-in-fraud-cases/">Whistleblower Law Blog post</a>, In 2007, whistleblowers&nbsp;were awarded $177 million for their efforts in&nbsp;bringing&nbsp;corporations to justice, most of&nbsp; which came from Health Care fraud. <br />
<br />
Another&nbsp;well known whistleblower and&nbsp;one of the most&nbsp;prominent&nbsp;in the health care&nbsp;segment is Dr. Peter Rost.&nbsp; He knows&nbsp;first hand&nbsp;how difficult it can be to bring a claim&nbsp;against a large pharma giant, such as Pfizer. Dr. Rost,&nbsp;former VP of Marketing for Pfizer, is an&nbsp;outspoken pharma whistleblower that went on to become an activist on the subject. He has&nbsp;authored several books including: KILLER DRUG and&nbsp;THE WHISTLEBLOWER, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman and&nbsp;maintains a blog known as&nbsp;<a href="http://peterrost.blogspot.com/">Question Authority</a>. </p>
<p>Is Pfizer off the hook? Can they breathe a sigh of relief? Are&nbsp;they&nbsp;in the clear with Lipitor, since&nbsp;the&nbsp;government chose not&nbsp;intervene in the qui tam claim?&nbsp;David Armstrong provides a nice answer to this&nbsp;in the Wall Street Journal&nbsp;article, &quot;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119811136568740957.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Pfizer Is Sued Over Lipitor Marketing</a>&quot;., when&nbsp;he writes&nbsp;&quot;The government hasn't intervened in other cases which led to huge fines against drug companies. One example is another case involving Pfizer, this one for the off-label marketing of Neurontin.&quot; Only time will how the claim against Pfizer for questionable marketing for the billion dollar drug will turn out.&nbsp;May the truth prevail in this uphill battle. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/home/">Pfizer</a> company issued statements, they&nbsp;are&nbsp;the world's largest research-based biomedical and pharmaceutical company.&nbsp;In 2006, they&nbsp;earned $48.4 billion in revenues and invested $7.6 billion in research and development. In a Pfizer fact sheet, the company writes,&nbsp;&quot;Every day, approximately 87,000 colleagues in more than 150 countries work to discover, develop, manufacture and deliver quality, safe and effective prescription medicines to patients.&quot; One can only hope they are not doing this at the sacrifice of&nbsp;lives in the&nbsp;process. </p>
<p>Pfizer stock most recently closed at <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/news/press_releases/pfizer_press_releases.jsp?rssUrl=http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/pfizer/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1006533&amp;newsId=20071018005482&amp;newsLang=en">$22.90</a>&nbsp;on the NYSE. <br />
</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119811136568740957.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">here</a> to read more on this this from the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119811136568740957.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">WallStreet Journal</a>&nbsp;online.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://whistleblower.labovick.com/2007/12/articles/whistleblower-legal-news/unsealed-qui-tam-complaint-against-pfizer-is-pressing-forward/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whistleblower.labovick.com/2007/12/articles/whistleblower-legal-news/unsealed-qui-tam-complaint-against-pfizer-is-pressing-forward/</guid>
<category>Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro</category><category>Lipitor</category><category>Polansky v. Pfizer</category><category>Qui tam Legal News</category><category>State and Local False Claims Acts</category><category>Whistleblower Legal News</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:15:29 -0500</pubDate>
<author>Juliet@LaBovick.com (LaBovick Law)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>