<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Mark S.Olinsky - Whistleblower Law Blog</title>
<link>http://whistleblower.labovick.com/articles/state-and-local-false-claims-a/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:06:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:00:04 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Defense counsel presents interesting arguments on New Jersey&apos;s False Claims Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Defense Counsel, <a href="http://www.sillscummis.com/attorney/attorney.asp?id=211">Mark S. Olinsky</a> of Sills Cummis &amp; Gross P.C., wrote an article for the Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, titled &quot;<a href="http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;artMonth=March&amp;artYear=2008&amp;EntryNo=8024">Defending Qui Tam Suits Under New Jersey's New False Claims</a>&quot;. One may find it strange for a Plaintiff's firm to highlight&nbsp;an article&nbsp;written by a Defense firm.&nbsp;&nbsp;Howeverm, this article&nbsp;is well written,&nbsp;provides a&nbsp;good introduction of the history of the False Claims Act,&nbsp; and acknowledges&nbsp;the&nbsp;New Jersey False Claims Act that will go into affect on March 13, 2008.&nbsp; &nbsp;As previously mentioned on the <a href="http://whistleblower.labovick.com/admin/trackback/56992">Whistleblower Law Blog,</a> New Jersey&nbsp;is among 20 states that have passed a state False Claims Act with qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the Federal False Claims Act.</p>
<p>Mr. Olinsky reference to whistleblowers as&nbsp;&quot;bounty hunters&quot; is interesting,&nbsp;when he writes&nbsp;&quot;New Jersey's new statute follows the federal version, and will invite suits by a new group of bounty-hunters - those involved with companies that do business with the State or &quot;any contractor, grantee or other recipient of State funds.&quot; </p>
<p>At&nbsp;the end of the article,&nbsp; Mr.Olinsky provides a useful corporate tip&nbsp;&nbsp;when he writes&nbsp;&quot;companies that do not already have in place a comprehensive compliance program - including training, anonymous reporting, and self-auditing - should make the implementation of such a program a top priority&quot;. The fines for a company found defrauding the government, can be expensive.&nbsp; As he&nbsp;points out,&nbsp;&quot;The New Jersey False Claims Act&nbsp; provides for treble damages&nbsp;and civil penalties of at least $5,000 to $10,000 per false claim.&quot;&nbsp; Several other states already have this penalty in force. </p>
<p>Whistleblowers or &quot;bounty hunters&quot; as Mr. Olinsky calls them, are out there ready and willing to report a company for defrauding the government. They get to share in the government's recovery, anywhere from 15% - 30%, depending upon the government's intervention in the case. However, despite the money, most whistleblowers would prefer for the&nbsp;company to&nbsp;stop the wrong doing and&nbsp;acknowledge them for&nbsp;reporting the fraud&nbsp;to management. In several instances, the whistleblower loses their job, friends and life as they know it, because the large corporations vilify the whistleblower.&nbsp;Just ask two of the most well known whistleblowers, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Rost_(doctor)">Dr. Peter Rost</a> formerly of <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/home/">Pfizer</a> or&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_Cooper_(whistleblower)">Cynthia Cooper</a> formerly of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldCom">Worldcom</a>.&nbsp;They told what they believed was the truth about their organizations and&nbsp;their worlds changed dramatically. Although both have written books&nbsp;and are household names&nbsp; if you asked&nbsp;them, why they&nbsp;came forward, I am sure they will say&nbsp;&quot;it was&nbsp; to tell the truth&quot;. We believe that whistleblowers are brave individuals that give up a lot to share the truth.&nbsp; A large corporation can pay defense firms millions of dollars to fight a qui tam claim and end up settling without admitting any wrongdoing. They can&nbsp;finance a&nbsp;well paid PR campaign to help with their&nbsp;public image,&nbsp;give millions to a worthy cause and life goes on as usual.&nbsp; At the end of the day, who stands to lose the most for coming forward?&nbsp;the brave whistleblower.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;artMonth=March&amp;artYear=2008&amp;EntryNo=8024">here</a> and&nbsp;check out the article on the New Jersey False Claims Act by Mr, Mark Olinsky and make your own conclusion.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://whistleblower.labovick.com/2008/03/articles/state-and-local-false-claims-a/defense-counsel-presents-interesting-arguments-on-new-jerseys-false-claims-act/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whistleblower.labovick.com/2008/03/articles/state-and-local-false-claims-a/defense-counsel-presents-interesting-arguments-on-new-jerseys-false-claims-act/</guid>
<category>Cynthia Cooper</category><category>Mark S.Olinsky</category><category>New Jersey False Claims Act</category><category>Peter Rost</category><category>Qui tam Legal News</category><category>State and Local False Claims Acts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
<author>Juliet@LaBovick.com (LaBovick Law)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>