Whistleblower Law Blog : Whistleblower Lawyer & Attorney : LaBovick Law Firm, Florida : Federal False Claims Act, Qui Tam

Maryland is moving in the right direction in the fight against Medicaid fraud. The Maryland Senate approved the Maryland False Claims Act of 2010 (Maryland Senate Bill 279). The new False Claims Act will allow the state to track and punish individuals and health care providers attempting to defraud low-income resident Medicaid programs run by the state. Included in the bill are provisions that permit a whistleblower to alert state investigators about fraudulent actions, and allow the whistleblower to collect a portion of any damages recovered by the state. The Maryland False Claims Act of 2010 passed by a vote of 37-8 in the Senate. Similar legislation is pending in the House.

However, the Maryland False Act presents limitations for whistleblowers in bringing  lawsuits against health care providers without intervention by the state. As a result, Maryland’s False Claims Act does not comply with Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 guidelines. This technicality reduces the state’s (and the whistleblower’s) ability to receive a larger percentage of any recovered damages.

Legal Blogger, Richard Renner, calls the Act  "watered down" in his post Maryland Senate passes watered-down state False Health Claims Act. He outlines key areas that could have strengthened the Act and questions whether the hospital administrators are important to the Maryland Senate or protecting taxpayer dollars.

Passage of the Maryland False Claims Act came after a series of amendments that received the backing of the Maryland Hospital Association, which opposed the bill last year. The Hospital Association did not want  whistleblowers to be able to bring a case on their own if the state decided not to pursue it. Their goal for the bill was to only go after "true fraud" not mistakes.

Last year efforts to pass the false claims act bill failed by one vote, largely because of vocal opponents. Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's persistence paid off this year, with the Maryland Senate voting for this legislation the same day President Barack Obama signed an overhaul of the nation's health care system.

"This reform targets those who cheat our system and steal Medicaid dollars that belong to those most in need," Brown said in a statement.
 

Click on the following links to read more on the Maryland False Claims Act 2010:

Maryland Senate Bill 279: Maryland False Health Claims Act of 2010

Maryland Senate approves civil penalties for making a false health claim - Washington Examiner

Lt. Governor Brown Statement Applauding Senate Passage of Maryland False Health Claims Act
- Press Release

Maryland Senate approves the false medicaid Claims Bill - Baltimore Business Journal

 

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Upon returning from holiday recess, the 111^th Congress of the United States introduced bill H.R. 4444, better known as the Defund the Crooks Act, in early January 2010. First introduced by Congressman Alan Grayson (D-FL), the Defund the Crooks Act prohibits the Federal Government from awarding Federal funds, contracts, or grants to covered organizations. The Act also prohibits the Federal Government from promoting certain organizations or from entering into other agreements with these organizations.

Based in part on the Defund ACORN Act of 2009, Congressman Grayson’s bill effectively broadens the scope of regulation while not basing the regulation on the acts of one organization. The purpose of the bill is essentially to ensure that Federal funds – taxpayer dollars – do not end up in the hands of organizations that fail to meet certain requirements.

According to the bill, “covered organizations” refers to several of the following examples:

• Any organization previously convicted of a Federal or State law violation
• Any organization that failed to comply with Federal or State laws leading to its corporate charter being revoked
• Any organization that has filed, transmitted, or submitted a fraudulent claim to any Federal or State agency
• Any organization that knowingly employs, contracts, or relegates authority to any individual who has been convicted of a Federal or State law violation

The Defund the Crooks Act states that no Federal funds, regardless of form, may be provided to organizations that do not meet the aforementioned requirements set out in the bill. It is important to note that the Act does not apply to organizations that received Federal funds prior to the enactment of the bill. However, if organizations that are now deemed unfit to receive Federal funds, grants, endorsements, etc. have a contract extending past the date of the bill’s enactment, they will be terminated.

Click on the following link to view the proposed bill H.R. 4444  introduced to Congress.

Click on the following to learn more on Congressman Grayson and the Defund the Crooks Act (H.R. 4444).

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (2)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Today, a qui tam suit that was brought against Kindred Healthcare, Inc. was settled for just over $1.3 million.  United States Attorney Russ Dedrick announced today that Kindred Healthcare, Inc. and its successor PharMerica Healthcare Pharmacy, LLC, have agreed to settle claims that Kindred violated state and federal laws regarding over-billing TennCare and the Medicaid program for pharmaceuticals.

The healthcare corporation provides medications to patients in group homes and long-term care facilities throughout Tennessee. It was alleged that between 2003 through 2006, Kindred overbilled for a higher number of drugs than were actually administered. There were instances where the overbilling occured multiple times the proper amount. 

Thanks to the valiant efforts of a former billing clerk employee of Kindred, this qui tam lawsuit was filed on behalf of the the United States and Tennessee under the qui tam provisions of the Tennessee Medicaid False Claims Act and the federal False Claims Act.. The whistleblower/ relator in this case will be rewarded over $200,000 for her role in filing the complaint and assisting with the investigation.

As mentioned previously on the Whistleblower Law Blog:

In a qui tam suit,  the whistleblower also known as a "relator" may be entitled to
15-30% of the government's total recovery, which includes damages for the false bills, tripled, plus civil penalties of from $5,000 to $10,000 per false claim. However, it is important to mention, that the relator/whistleblower must have complied with the statutory requirements to be eligible for the whistleblower reward.

To learn more on the Kindred settlement, read the DOJ release reqarding the qui tam settlement for Kindred Health.

To learn more on qui tam and the federal false claims act, visit our qui tam section on the LaBovick website.

 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Illinois based Walgreen's Pharmacy has agreed to settle a qui tam case for $35 Million that involves drug switching of the following drugs: Ranitidine (or Zantac), which inhibits stomach acid production; Fluoxetine (or Prozac), an antidepressant; and Eldepryl, known generically as selegiline, which is used with other medications to treat the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Reports showed that  Walgreens fraudulently increased reimbursement from Medicaid by switching the form of the drug dispensed to Medicaid patients while providing no additional medical benefit to patients.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the case was initially filed in 2003, by Whistleblower and licensed pharmacist Bernard Listiza. The Whistleblower should receive approximately $5 million of the total $35 Million qui tam settlement and the federal government will receive approximately $18.6 million of the settlement. The remaining $16.4 million will be shared by over 40 states and Puerto Rico, due to separate settlement agreements.

A breakdown of the shares of the Walgreen's settlement by state includes: Florida receives $9.8 million, Illinois, $1.25 million, Georgia $401,000, Indiana $289,000, Ohio $161,000, New Jersey $1.25 million and Pennsylvania $9,000.

Click here to read more on this Whistleblower Medicaid fraud case from the Chicago Tribune.

 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

I want to laugh when people buy into corporate propaganda. Don't you just love people who believe in a "trickle down" theory will actually trickle down to them. I also laugh when the oil companies cry that OPEC is charging too much and Exxon posts multi-Billion dollar profits. Do you believe them? How about the insurance industry that cries about how lawsuits are killing them, and turn around and post multi-billion dollar profits year after year. Corporations spin this propaganda until the average American believes it. Isn’t it Amazing?

The new spin from Beck/Herman legal bloggers for the Drug and Device Law blog claims that The False Claims Act is a "stealth tax". I was shocked by this sentiment when I came across their post “By Litigation - A Dubious Proposal To Expand False Claims Act Liability”. I am not sure what they are reading, but the last time I read the act, the purpose of the act was to catch companies and individuals that are ripping off the Federal Government. How anyone can refer to the False Claims Act as a Stealth Tax is an act of spin that is worth memorializing.

The Beck/Hermann post acts as if the poor company is being looted by pirates instead of realizing that it is the pirates who are being brought to justice. So, don't let the “spinmeisters” confuse you. What would you prefer, letting the poor companies continue to rip off your tax dollars so they can get richer and richer while you pay more and more in taxes?

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This week, Defense Counsel, Mark S. Olinsky of Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., wrote an article for the Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, titled "Defending Qui Tam Suits Under New Jersey's New False Claims". One may find it strange for a Plaintiff's firm to highlight an article written by a Defense firm.  Howeverm, this article is well written, provides a good introduction of the history of the False Claims Act,  and acknowledges the New Jersey False Claims Act that will go into affect on March 13, 2008.   As previously mentioned on the Whistleblower Law Blog, New Jersey is among 20 states that have passed a state False Claims Act with qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the Federal False Claims Act.

Mr. Olinsky reference to whistleblowers as "bounty hunters" is interesting, when he writes "New Jersey's new statute follows the federal version, and will invite suits by a new group of bounty-hunters - those involved with companies that do business with the State or "any contractor, grantee or other recipient of State funds."

At the end of the article,  Mr.Olinsky provides a useful corporate tip  when he writes "companies that do not already have in place a comprehensive compliance program - including training, anonymous reporting, and self-auditing - should make the implementation of such a program a top priority". The fines for a company found defrauding the government, can be expensive.  As he points out, "The New Jersey False Claims Act  provides for treble damages and civil penalties of at least $5,000 to $10,000 per false claim."  Several other states already have this penalty in force.

Whistleblowers or "bounty hunters" as Mr. Olinsky calls them, are out there ready and willing to report a company for defrauding the government. They get to share in the government's recovery, anywhere from 15% - 30%, depending upon the government's intervention in the case. However, despite the money, most whistleblowers would prefer for the company to stop the wrong doing and acknowledge them for reporting the fraud to management. In several instances, the whistleblower loses their job, friends and life as they know it, because the large corporations vilify the whistleblower. Just ask two of the most well known whistleblowers, Dr. Peter Rost formerly of Pfizer or Cynthia Cooper formerly of Worldcom. They told what they believed was the truth about their organizations and their worlds changed dramatically. Although both have written books and are household names  if you asked them, why they came forward, I am sure they will say "it was  to tell the truth". We believe that whistleblowers are brave individuals that give up a lot to share the truth.  A large corporation can pay defense firms millions of dollars to fight a qui tam claim and end up settling without admitting any wrongdoing. They can finance a well paid PR campaign to help with their public image, give millions to a worthy cause and life goes on as usual.  At the end of the day, who stands to lose the most for coming forward? the brave whistleblower. 

Click here and check out the article on the New Jersey False Claims Act by Mr, Mark Olinsky and make your own conclusion.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This week the Louisiana Legislature along with Governor Bobby Jindal, launched an "Extraordinary Session". In a bi-partisan effort, the legislators joined together to introduce  and strengthen key legislation that combats government fraud in their state. The Senate, led by Senator Kostela, introduced SB 41 , a Louisiana False Claims Act, which is aimed at authorizing qui tam incentives and standing to citizens to pursue certain fraud claims. The House, led by Rep. Jim Tucker,  introduced, HB 69, which is aimed at, Authorizing a qui tam action for persons who disclose certain cases of fraud.

The Louisiana Legislator's "Extraordinary Session" started February 10, 2008 and is expected to end by  March 1, 2008.  The Session has Seven key priorities, one of which is to combat fraud and abuse. The goals included are: NO. 1 - Financial Disclosure, NO. 2 - Conflicts of Interest, NO. 3 - Transparency for Lobbyists, ITEM NO. 4 - Improving Ethics Education and Enforcement, ITEM NO. 5 - Transparency and Public Access to Information, ITEM NO. 6 - Further Combating Fraud and Abuse, and ITEM NO. 7 - Improve Campaign Finance Laws

Item NO. 6 language includes the following:

To legislate relative to other public officers and private citizens participating in the prevention of fraud and abuse by:
(1) enabling the Office of Inspector General by statute;
(2) granting authority to local inspector generals and ethical governing bodies to issue and enforce subpoenas in state court and providing for confidentiality during investigations by such;
(3) expanding whistleblower protection to prohibit threats of reprisal to public servants; and
(4) authorizing qui tam incentives and standing to citizens to pursue public fraud cases when the state refuses to act.

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine signed the new bill into law this week. New Jersey is among 20 states that have passed a state False Claims Act with qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the Federal False Claims Act. The Whistleblower Law Blog reported in early January, the passing of the New Jersey False Claims Act, Bill S232, by the Senate.

Qui Tam whistleblower provisions also help fight Medicaid fraud, as Brian F. LaBovick, Esq. explains in his article on "How Qui Tam helps fight Medicaid fraud" that was published by Thomson West Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter.

States that have “State False Claims” statutes include: New Jersey, Florida, Georgia, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and the District of Columbia. As mentioned in a previous post on the Whistleblower Law Blog last year, we included State False Claims Acts for our readers. Another resourceful consumer advocate website is Tax Payers Against Fraud.

A few states that have made proposals to enact a State False Claims Act, include: North Carolina, South Carolina, North Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, and Pennsylvania.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Illinois has strengthened their whistleblower protection laws as of January 1, 2008. The Illinois legislators expanded existing whistle-blower laws and increased the protections and rewards earned by people reporting fraud.  According to Lt. Governor Pat Quinn, in a Chicago Tribune article, the new Illinois Whistleblower Protection Act protects people from getting fired if they report fraud and gives them up to 30 percent of the amount recovered. The government can also collect treble damages for the fraud in restitution and levy fines up to $10,000.

The Illinois (740 ILCS 175/) Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act was introduced by Rep. John A. Fritchey, former Illinois Assistant Attorney General.

States that have “State False Claims” statutes include: New Jersey, Florida, Georgia, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and the District of Columbia. As mentioned in a previous post on the Whistleblower Law Blog last year, we included State False Claims Acts for our readers. Another resourceful consumer advocate website is Tax Payers Against Fraud.

A few states that have made proposals to enact a State False Claims Act, include: North Carolina, South Carolina, North Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, and Pennsylvania.

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In an unusual turn of events, a Massachusetts based  Limo company agreed to pay $65,000 to settle a qui tam case for improperly paying tolls. According to an article in Worcester Telegram & Gazette's telegram.com, the Limo company, allegedly made drivers use personal toll transponders linked to Boston addresses to pay 40-cent resident discount tolls to avoid the $4.50 commercial tunnel toll.  The company agreed to pay the Turnpike Authority $32,500 for avoided tolls and also pay the state another $32,500 in penalties. The settlement specifically provides for the company to continue using commercial Fast Lane automatic toll payment transponders for its business.

The Toll Authorities identified the improper use of the transponders by using video cameras to match transponder signals to pictures of cars going through the Fast Lane toll booths, according to court documents. The complaint was based on the state’s False Claims Act that allows the state to collect damages from those who knowingly underpay for state services. Massachusetts is among 21 states that have passed a State False Claims Act that is similar to the Federal False Claims Act. The states that have passed a State False Claims Act Statute include: California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, New Jersey and the District of Columbia.

Click here to read more about the Limo company's qui tam settlement from telegram.com
Click here to read more about the 21 states with a state False Claims act for qui tam related cases from Tafnet.org

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

New Jersey has joined in the fight against qui tam and Medicaid fraud against the government in New Jersey.  Thanks to the efforts of Senators John H. Adler and Joseph F. Vitale Co-Sponsors of S232, the New Jersey False Claims Act was approved by the Senate in a vote of of 37-0.

The New Jersey False Claims Act, Bill S232, allows residents in New Jersey to bring an action, against anyone, who intentionally causes the State to pay a false claim. If a person is found guilty in court, the bill would create civil penalties, between $5,000 and $10,000, for each verified count of a false claim, as well as imposing up to three-times the cost of any losses the public entity would have sustained because of the false claim.

The bill also sets up a whistleblower incentive to come forward with any information about false claims. If a false claim is proven in court, the whistleblower would be entitled to 15% to 25% of the proceeds recovered for New Jersey if the Attorney General brings the case, and 25% to 30% of the proceeds if the case is brought by the whistleblower. The exact amount of whistleblower compensation is determined by the courts.

I could not agree more with Senator Adler's statement of  "This bill will be another weapon in the arsenal of good government.”  It would be great if all states had a State False Claims Act that mirrored the Federal False Claims Act. It would send a strong message to individuals and corporations to think twice before defrauding the government. It would also encourage more individuals to come forward and report fraud against the government.

The Bill now heads to the Assembly before going to the desk of Governor Jon Corzine for signature of the Bill to be signed into Law. 

Click here to read the News Release from the New Jersey Senate Democrats.
Click here to read more from Jason Butkowski and PolitikerNJ.com.
Click here for a copy of the New Jersey False Claims Act.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The qui tam complaint against Pfizer, USA rel. Polansky v. Pfizer is pressing forward according to court documents filed by the Plaintiff's legal counsel, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro. To view the complaint, click here. (Warning, the document is pretty lengthy, 97 pages, but worth every moment spent reading.) This comes after the whistleblower complaint being initially filed with the federal government about 3 1/2 years ago and the federal government deciding recently not to intervene.

It can be difficult for a whistleblower to press forward with a qui tam claim, they often lose their jobs, face retaliation, lose family and friends and often are forced to give up something they truly love. ). The Pharmafraud Blogger discusses challenges whistleblowers can face while trying to do what is right, in the recent post  Big Pharma Retaliation, Just More of the Same, "If you think Dr. Polansky, or I, or any other "whistleblower" was motivated by money to file a qui tam, then you are sorely mistaken. Every one of us simply tried to do what was right".  However, I must add that whistleblowers, if successful, can receive up to 30 percent of the proceeds of what the government recovers. As we mentioned in a prior Whistleblower Law Blog post, In 2007, whistleblowers were awarded $177 million for their efforts in bringing corporations to justice, most of  which came from Health Care fraud.

Another well known whistleblower and one of the most prominent in the health care segment is Dr. Peter Rost.  He knows first hand how difficult it can be to bring a claim against a large pharma giant, such as Pfizer. Dr. Rost, former VP of Marketing for Pfizer, is an outspoken pharma whistleblower that went on to become an activist on the subject. He has authored several books including: KILLER DRUG and THE WHISTLEBLOWER, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman and maintains a blog known as Question Authority.

Is Pfizer off the hook? Can they breathe a sigh of relief? Are they in the clear with Lipitor, since the government chose not intervene in the qui tam claim? David Armstrong provides a nice answer to this in the Wall Street Journal article, "Pfizer Is Sued Over Lipitor Marketing"., when he writes "The government hasn't intervened in other cases which led to huge fines against drug companies. One example is another case involving Pfizer, this one for the off-label marketing of Neurontin." Only time will how the claim against Pfizer for questionable marketing for the billion dollar drug will turn out. May the truth prevail in this uphill battle.

According to Pfizer company issued statements, they are the world's largest research-based biomedical and pharmaceutical company. In 2006, they earned $48.4 billion in revenues and invested $7.6 billion in research and development. In a Pfizer fact sheet, the company writes, "Every day, approximately 87,000 colleagues in more than 150 countries work to discover, develop, manufacture and deliver quality, safe and effective prescription medicines to patients." One can only hope they are not doing this at the sacrifice of lives in the process.

Pfizer stock most recently closed at $22.90 on the NYSE.

Click here to read more on this this from the WallStreet Journal online.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Florida based  WellCare, a provider of government-sponsored health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, recently learned of a quitam action launched by a former employee. The matter is currently under seal, while the government is investigating the nature of the quitam claim.  According to the Federal False Claims Act Statute USC § 3730, the quitam complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The Government may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after it receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. Therefore, Wellcare does not have all of the details of the quitam case. As previously mentioned in this Whistleblower Law Blog, a private citizen can file a suit in the name of the U.S. or State Government charging fraud by government contractors and other entities that receive or use government funds, and share in any funds the government recovers. 

WallStreet Journal Reporters, Heather Won Tesoriero and Theo Francis, uncovered more details on the quitam lawsuit filed by, a former financial-department employee of Harmony Behavioral Health, a WellCare subsidiary. According to the report, Wellcare allegedly defrauded the state-federal health-care program of more than $35 million over five years. This was based on an investigation into how the company collected funds for mental health services. The company was paid more for treating younger patients, which would be a  deceptive measure if the ages of patients were falsified. The company's Cayman Island unit is also coming under scrutiny for possibly inflating premiums and inflating expenses.

Amidst all the drama surrounding Wellcare, the stock recently had a surge in trading, according to a recent article by  Wall Street Journal reporter, Nick Timiraos.  After Wellcare acknowledged details about the whistleblower's termination, the investors seem to have settled down, stocks increased 39% to $38 and traded over 10 million shares. The shareholders must be breathing a sigh of relief. Wellcare announced that revenues increased 41% third quarter, compared to prior year's figures.  This is positive news for the investors.

All eyes are on the Florida Based Wellcare.  Will the whistleblower share in the government's reward, if this case is settled or goes to trial? Will the government recoup the alleged $35 million plus treble damages, if the company is found guilty of a quitam or false claims act violation?

Time will tell... Stay tuned...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Florida Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of statutory provisions against filing false claims and engaging in patient brokering in the unanimous opinion in State of Florida v. John Anthony Rubio, et al.

The Court overturned most of a 5th District Court of Appeal opinion that held Medicaid fraud provisions unconstitutional and removed a criminal case against two Miami dentists and their colleagues.

The new Florida Supreme Court ruling allows the state to proceed with a criminal case against the defendants and others like them. Since South Florida is a magnet for Medicaid Fraud, congratulations to law makers for writing tougher laws and Florida Attorney General, Bill McCollum's  office for prosecuting fraud cases to the fullest extent. This will help prevent Medicaid fraud Scammers from targeting our state.   I can only  hope that the new Florida False Claims Act and this Supreme Court decision in State of Florida v. John Anthony Rubio are only the first of many good things to come in fighting the war on fraud in Florida.

Click Here to read more about the recent Supreme Court decision State of Florida v. John Anthony Rubio, et al. in an article from the Daily Business Review. 

The Whistleblower Law Blog is presented as a service of the Private Law Firm, LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A., Civil Justice Prosecutors. LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A. is a Plaintiff's firm that represents whistleblowers in Florida and throughout the nation in qui tam (False Claims Act) litigation.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Fernando and Ileana Fonts, owners and operators of Free Line Medical Equipment in Miami, were arrested and charged with organized fraud for falsely billing the Florida Medicaid program more than $1 million. 

“Our Medicaid program exists to ensure that our citizens receive the medical care they need,” said Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum. “When individuals attempt to steal those funds, other people in genuine need are victimized.”

The Agency for Health Care Administration tipped off the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, with information that the Fonts were failing to perform their services, by either not delivering equipment or delivering faulty equipment while billing Medicaid for fully functional equipment. This is a serious issue because not only were the Fonts stealing from the government, but they were also putting the lives of the patients with severe breathing problems in danger.

If Fernando and Ileana Fonts are prosecuted for Florida False Claims Act (qui tam) violations, they could be face substantial penalties. According to the new Florida False Claims Act violators face civil penalties for making false or fraudulent claims, written or electronically, to the government for the purpose of getting a false or fraudulent claim paid. The penalties can be up to $11,000 per claim and triple the amount of damages the government agency sustains. The new Florida False Claims Act was approved and signed into law in June 2007 by Governor Charlie Crist.

Click Here to read more from the Attorney General's Office on this case.

The Whistleblower Law Blog is presented as a service of the Private Law Firm, LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A., Civil Justice Prosecutors. LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A. is a Plaintiff's firm that represents whistleblowers in Florida and throughout the nation in qui tam (False Claims Act) litigation.

 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Florida is the newest state to put more bite into their State False Claims Act. The new bill - CS/SB 2312 - Florida False Claims Act [LPCC] was signed into law on June 28, 2007 by Governor Charlie Crist.  The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Oelrich and received overwhelming support by the Judiciary Committee. The new law will also allow the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit to recover triple damages in civil lawsuits against those who commit Medicaid fraud. "This new law will provide us with the tools necessary to strengthen our investigation and prosecution of individuals who are cheating the system", said Attorney General Bill McCollum. 

Highlights from the new Florida False Claims ACT - S2312:   The Florida False Claims Act  is to prevent the state from paying false & fraudulent claims; redefines term "claim" to include claims filed electronically; provides that person is liable for civil penalty if he or she files false or fraudulent claim; reduces time limits for false claim proceedings; revises period in which stay to conduct discovery may be granted, etc. Amends 68.081-.085,.089.

Click Here to Read the new Florida False Claims Act.

The Whistleblower Law Blog is presented as a service of the Private Law Firm, LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A., Civil Justice Prosecutors. LaBovick & LaBovick, P.A. is a Plaintiff's firm that represents whistleblowers in Florida and throughout the nation in qui tam (False Claims Act) litigation.

 

 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Today, the Governor Sonny Perdue, signed Georgia's State False Medicaid Claims Act. Representative Eward Lindsay was the Bill's sponsor. Kudo's to our fellow blogger and qui tam champion Michael A. Sullivan, Esq. of Finch McCraine, LLP (author of the whistleblowerlawyerblog) for being invited to the private ceremonies. This is a true testament of the good work and efforts of Attorney Sullivan. We need more courageous champions around the country willing to roll-up their sleeves and help their states enact legislation that fights fraud. It is good to know that we are not alone in this fight against fraud. Our very own, Brian F. LaBovick, Esq. does his part by educating attorneys and private citizens on the intricacies of bringing a qui tam claim and their rights.

The new law that Georgia enacted today is aimed at protecting Georgia's Medicaid funds by creating penalties for each false claim submitted for payment by the Georgia Medicaid Program. Citizens who report fraud and have the necessary evidence can collect up to 25% of the recovery money. This is a great pay out for being responsible and civic minded.

Currently there are over 15 states that have State Fraud Claims on their books to protect their state's tax dollars used in state programs. They will all graciously take advantage of the additional monies granted by Congress (10% of Medicaid fraud recoveries) to states that pass laws with similar provisions that are as effective as the federal False Claims Act.

Another milestone has been reached and the fight against fraud continues. Congratulations to everyone in Georgia and other states around the country for taking a stand on fraud against the government.

Click Here to read a copy of the the new State False Medicaid Claims Act in Georgia.

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Georgia made history this week by passing a "State False Medicaid Claims Act" in the Senate. It is now enroute to Governor Sonny Perdue's office for his blessing and signature. One passed, it will be the newest state to follow the federal False Claims Act. 

Many states are creating State False Claims Acts in response to the incentives Congress adopted in the Deficit Reduction Act. New York recently approved a State False Claims Act.

Representative Edward Lindsey and Senator Seth Harp  sponsored this Bill.

Click Here to read the Georgia Whistleblower Bill.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

There are several states and municipalities with their their own versions of the False Claims Act, that allow whistleblowers to recover money against businesses that defraud state and local governments.  Included in this list on the state level are Arkansas*, California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana,Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and on the Municipal level: the District of Columbia, the City of New York and the City of Chicago.

* Arkansas False Claims Act is unlike other states, in the sense that a private person can't file a qui tam claim.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link