The USA et al Relator v McKesson and Big Pharma's drug diversion practices

The captivating Pharma Fraud blog brings us an interesting perspective into the world of drug diversion by leading Pharmaceutical companies.  In a recent post, Pharma Fraud, includes an interview with a Relator in The USA et al Relator v McKesson et al case. This is the case that alleges three Big Wholesalers and Henry Schein,  encouraged and engaged in the diversion into the gray market of drugs manufactured by Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”). It names the giant distributer, Henry Schein as a major player in purchasing diverted Merck drugs and selling them to wholesalers.

What makes this a Qui Tam case? The manufacturers are supposed to pay a rebate to Medicaid according to Federal and State Medicaid law. If they are guilty of hiding the huge discounts to commercial customers in order to avoid paying rebates on the difference between AMP (Average Manufacturer's Price)and Best Price, which Federal and State Medicaid law requires they pay, this is a violation of the False Claims Act and is a Qui Tam case.

The amended complaint was filed in Camera under seal in May, 2007 with Plaintiff's, U.S., several states including Florida and Texas. The Defendant's named in The USA et al Relator v McKesson et al  include McKesson, Cardinal Health, Amerisourcebergen and Henry Schein, Inc.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://whistleblower.labovick.com/admin/trackback/46749
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Pharmaceutical Fraud - September 12, 2011 12:52 AM

This type of cases are such an eye openers for other companies for steps to avoid to be involved in any QUI tam or fraud cases.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.